Original Research

Method validation and antioxidant activities of Hyperacanthus amoenus and Carissa bispinosa

Kedibone G. Kgosana, Tirelo Matlala
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research | Vol 91, No 1 | a2182 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v91i1.2182 | © 2024 Kedibone G. Kgosana, Tirelo Matlala | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 02 April 2024 | Published: 13 December 2024

About the author(s)

Kedibone G. Kgosana, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
Tirelo Matlala, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Plant foliages used as feed additives pose a health risk due to high oxidant concentrations. Oxidants cause oxidative stress and high rate of morbidities and mortalities. Hence, the aim of the study was to validate the methods to quantify gallic acid (GA) and quercetin (Q) as putative antioxidants, and to evaluate antioxidant activities in feed (F), Hyperacanthus amoenus (HA) and Carissa bispinosa (CB) extracts. Extraction was carried out with 62.5% methanol. Method validations for linearity, accuracy and precision were performed on high performance liquid chromatography. Quantitative analysis of GA and Q and testing of 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activities in the extracts were performed. The lowest limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.011 µg/mL and 0.032 µg/mL were determined in HA, respectively. The methods were accurate and precise as the relative standard deviations (%RSD) were less than 15%. The GA concentrations in CB and HA extracts were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and their values were 0.65 ± 0.03 x 106 µg/kg dry weight (DW) (0.13%) and 0.28 ± 0.06 x 106 µg/kg DW (0.002%), respectively. All extracts showed very strong radical scavenging activities with their IC50 values ranging between 5.87 µg/mL and 6.86 µg/mL.

Contribution: These accurate, repeatable, precise and reliable methods can be used to provide a valuable basis for GA and Q analysis in various shrub foliages. Though high GA concentrations have potential to act as antioxidants, they may have adverse health and growth performance effects when used as feed additives, while lower Q concentrations may have no effects on livestock.


Keywords

feed additive; nutritional browse; plant extracts; foliage; phenolic acid; high performance liquid chromatography; free radical; antioxidants

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 234
Total article views: 185


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.