Original Research
Unveiling brucellosis risks in breeding herds: Case study on diagnostic failures and control gaps in South Africa
Submitted: 01 December 2025 | Published: 31 July 2026
About the author(s)
Koketso D. Mazwi, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; and, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South AfricaEmmanuel P. Lita, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; and, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Juba, Juba, Sudan
Ayesha Hassim, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Emmanuel Seakamela, Bacteriology Division, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Pretoria, South Africa
Itumeleng Matle, Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida, South Africa
Farah Abdool-Khader, Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Johannesburg, South Africa
Gerhardus S. Scheepers, Zodiac Dierekliniek Veterinary Clinic, Brits, South Africa
Yusuf B. Ngoshe, Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Henriette van Heerden, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Abstract
Brucellosis is a zoonotic pathogen of livestock, wildlife and humans, with significant implications for reproductive losses and public health. The movement and introduction of breeding animals with unknown status into previously Brucella-negative herds pose a risk for disease introduction and sustained transmission. This case study documents two independent brucellosis outbreaks integrating epidemiological observations with serial serological testing, bacteriological culture and molecular confirmatory assays following abortion events. Diagnostic tests were performed, including serology, PCR and culture from diverse samples. On a cattle farm, animals previously certified as brucellosis-negative demonstrated progressive seroconversion from 2024 onwards. Brucella abortus was detected in the blood clots of tested animals using abortus-melitensis-ovis-suis PCR (AMOS-PCR), including a suspect bull that later tested seronegative on follow-up serology. A Brucella-positive human case occurred following direct exposure to the infected cattle farm, underscoring the zoonotic risk. On the sable antelope farm, B. abortus was detected in two seropositive females through culture of lymph nodes and amniotic fluid, while B. abortus was also isolated from the semen of a seronegative breeding bull, suggesting that the bull was a carrier and posing a transmission risk to the herd. The findings demonstrate that infected breeding males may remain seronegative while actively harbouring and shedding B. abortus. This study indicates that seronegative breeding males can undermine brucellosis control programmes, may act as undetected reservoirs of infection, thereby challenging current surveillance strategies. The findings highlight the diagnostic limitations of relying solely on serological tests, particularly in chronically infected cattle and wildlife, and support the integration of more sensitive assays, such as iELISA, alongside PCR methods, into diagnostic strategies on brucellosis-affected farms to improve detection and support eradication efforts.
Contribution: Strengthened biosecurity, systematic testing of breeding males, and comprehensive vaccination programmes are critical to preventing ongoing spillover among livestock, wildlife, and humans in South Africa.
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goal
Metrics
Total abstract views: 305Total article views: 294
