Abstracts

Rift Valley fever: Real or perceived threat for Zambia?

George Dautu, Calvin Sindato, Aaron S. Mweene, Kenny L. Samui, Polly Roy, Robert Noad, Janusz Paweska, Phelix A.O. Majiwa, Antony Musoke
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research | Vol 79, No 2 | a466 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v79i2.466 | © 2012 George Dautu, Calvin Sindato, Aaron S. Mweene, Kenny L. Samui, Polly Roy, Robert Noad, Janusz Paweska, Phelix A.O. Majiwa, Antony Musoke | This work is licensed under CC Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
Submitted: 12 June 2012 | Published: 20 June 2012

About the author(s)

George Dautu, Department of Disease Control, University of Zambia, Zambia
Calvin Sindato, National Institute for Medical Research, Tabora, Tanzania, United Republic of
Aaron S. Mweene, Department of Disease Control, University of Zambia, Zambia
Kenny L. Samui, Department of Disease Control, University of Zambia, Zambia
Polly Roy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
Robert Noad, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, United Kingdom
Janusz Paweska, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa
Phelix A.O. Majiwa, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Onderstepoort, South Africa
Antony Musoke, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Onderstepoort, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Rift Valley fever (RVF) in Zambia was first reported in 1974 during an epizootic of cattle and sheep that occurred in parts of Central, Southern and Copperbelt Provinces. In 1990, the disease was documented in nine districts of the provinces of Zambia. In the last two decades, there have been no reports of RVF. This long period without reported clinical disease raises questions as to whether RVF is a current or just a perceived threat. To address this question, World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) disease occurrence data on RVF for the period 2005−2010 in the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) was analysed. From the analysis, it was evident that most countries that share a common border with Zambia had reported at least one occurrence of the disease during the period under review. Due to the absence of natural physical barriers between Zambia and most of her neighbours, informal livestock trade and movements is a ubiquitous reality. Analysis of the rainfall patterns also showed that Zambia received rains sufficient to support a mosquito population large enough for high risk of RVF transmission. The evidence of disease occurrence in nearby countries coupled with animal movement, and environmental risk suggests that RVF is a serious threat to Zambia. In conclusion, the current occurrence of RVF in Zambia is unclear, but there are sufficient indications that the magnitude of the circulating infection is such that capacity building in disease surveillance and courses on recognition of the disease for field staff is recommended. Given the zoonotic potential of RVF, these measures are also a prerequisite for accurate assessment of the disease burden in humans.

Keywords

Rift Valley Fever; rainfall; vector; surveillance

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3432
Total article views: 10338


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.